skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Miao, Sentao"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. In recent decades, the advance of information technology and abundant personal data facilitate the application of algorithmic personalized pricing. However, this leads to the growing concern of potential violation of privacy because of adversarial attack. To address the privacy issue, this paper studies a dynamic personalized pricing problem with unknown nonparametric demand models under data privacy protection. Two concepts of data privacy, which have been widely applied in practices, are introduced: central differential privacy (CDP) and local differential privacy (LDP), which is proved to be stronger than CDP in many cases. We develop two algorithms that make pricing decisions and learn the unknown demand on the fly while satisfying the CDP and LDP guarantee, respectively. In particular, for the algorithm with CDP guarantee, the regret is proved to be at most [Formula: see text]. Here, the parameter T denotes the length of the time horizon, d is the dimension of the personalized information vector, and the key parameter [Formula: see text] measures the strength of privacy (smaller ε indicates a stronger privacy protection). Conversely, for the algorithm with LDP guarantee, its regret is proved to be at most [Formula: see text], which is near optimal as we prove a lower bound of [Formula: see text] for any algorithm with LDP guarantee. 
    more » « less